Reply to the comment on “A remarkable last glacial loess sedimentation at Roxolany in the Dniester Liman (Southern Ukraine)” by

Bakhmutov and Hlavatskyi (2022) (BH) in their comment on our paper (Łanczont et al., 2022) focus on issue of the magnetostratigraphy of the whole loess-palaeosol sequence at Roxolany. However, we analysed only the formation conditions of the upper part of this sequence, which we believe to be of the Late Pleistocene. Its exceptionally large thickness is a very local phenomenon and we consider this site as an interesting case study, atypical for other areas of Ukraine and south-eastern Europe. In our paper, we described the formation of the loess cover in a close location in relation to the palaeorelief of the region referring to the Black Sea level oscillation. Unfortunately, BH do not address our multi-directional interpretation of the S2-L2-S1-L1-S0 sequence based on the multi-proxy results. They only refer to stratigraphic background outlined very briefly in the introduction. This outline was necessary before the discussion our main research topic. BH noted that our stratigraphy did not take into account their latest published data regarding magnetostratigraphy and magnetic susceptibility, and in particular, the position of the Matuyama/Brunhes boundary. However, their magnetostratigraphic interpretation of this profile is questionable due to the lack of analysis of the magnetic carriers while detecting their differentiation during the demagnetization process.