Do fiscal rules of local debt affect municipal off-budget activities? Analysis of various types of municipalities

Abstract Purpose–This paper aims to determine whether local governments (LGs) use non-consolidated municipally owned companies (MOCs), excluded from public sector entities and, consequently, from sub-national debt to avoid fiscal debt limits. This paper contributes to the literature by analysing the fiscal debt rule’s impact on the off-budget municipal activities in total and separate in different types of local government units.Design/methodology/approach–This paper uses difference-in-differences and the system general method of moments model with the Blundell–Bond estimator for dynamic panel data analysis of MOCsowned by 866 Polish municipalities in 2010–2018. Findings–This paper shows that the MOCs’revenues support limited local public debt capacity by indebtedness restrictions imposed on municipalities in 2014. As a result, less indebted municipalities have higher off-budget revenues. The tightening of fiscal rules related to sub-sovereign indebtedness increased off-budget activities, but that effect is much stronger in rural and rural–urban municipalities than in urban municipalities and big cities.Originality/value–This paper contributes to the literature by exploring the fiscal debt rule’s impact on the off-budget municipal activities in total and separate in different types of local government units. In this paper, the authors combine theories relating to private and public finance; this is a novel approach and one that is also necessary–as, in fact, the worlds of public and private actors intersect–as exemplified by the existence of MOC.KeywordsFiscal rules, Public sector accounting, Fiscal debt constraint, Municipally owned companies, Non-consolidation, Off-budget activityPaper type Research paper