Artykuł w czasopiśmie
Brak miniatury
Licencja
ClosedAccessDostęp zamknięty
 

Comment on “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution”

Uproszczony widok
cris.lastimport.scopus2024-02-12T20:06:47Z
dc.abstract.enThis Correspondence, in response to an article published by Niederberger and co-workers (ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 935–940), comments on misleading conclusions of the authors of that paper regarding the fate of the aqueous methanesulfonic acid electrolyte during photoelectrolysis performed using the WO3 photoanode. It is shown that the suggested formation of the acid dimer is in striking contrast with numerous literature reports.
dc.affiliationUniwersytet Warszawski
dc.contributor.authorSolarska, Renata
dc.contributor.authorAugustyński, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T19:49:57Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T19:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.financeNie dotyczy
dc.description.number9
dc.description.volume82
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/CPLU.201700160
dc.identifier.issn2192-6506
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/103311
dc.languageeng
dc.pbn.affiliationchemical sciences
dc.relation.ispartofChemPlusChem
dc.relation.pages1167-1168
dc.rightsClosedAccess
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.subject.enoxygen evolution photoanodes photocurrent tungsten trioxide water splitting
dc.titleComment on “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution”
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication