Artykuł w czasopiśmie
Brak miniatury
Licencja

 

Rule of Law v. the Rule of Men and Women: What’s in the Distinction?

Uproszczony widok
cris.lastimport.scopus2024-02-12T20:20:16Z
dc.abstract.enIn this very short essay, for a Festschrift edition of the Hague Journal on the Rule of Law dedicated to Professor Martin Krygier, I take as a point of departure some observations on the opposite of the ideal of the rule of law, i.e. the much-maligned concept of the “rule of men [and women]”. By reflecting upon this counter-ideal, I hope to discern some aspects of the ideal of the rule of law itself. By proceeding in the teleological spirit of Krygier’s rule-of-law oeuvre, I intend to ascertain what it is that is truly objectionable about the counter-ideal. Or perhaps it is not that objectionable, after all? This aspect of my argument is modelled on “devil’s advocate” reasoning. Having discerned the only interpretation of the counter-ideal of the “rule of men and women” which is serious and objectionable at the same time (namely, producing Hayekian coercion), I propose a way of addressing the harm discerned in this counter-ideal (namely, that legal coercion should be always based on public reasons), and in this way, contribute to our thinking about the ideal of the rule of law itself.
dc.affiliationUniwersytet Warszawski
dc.contributor.authorSadurski, Wojciech
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T19:29:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T19:29:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.accesstimeAT_PUBLICATION
dc.description.financeNie dotyczy
dc.description.versionFINAL_PUBLISHED
dc.description.volume11
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/S40803-019-00094-2
dc.identifier.issn1876-4045
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/118893
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-019-00094-2
dc.languageeng
dc.pbn.affiliationpolitical and administrative sciences
dc.relation.ispartofHague Journal on the Rule of Law
dc.relation.pages377-382
dc.rightsOther
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.subject.enrule of law
dc.subject.enpublic reason
dc.subject.enMartin Krygier
dc.subject.enFriedrich A Hayek
dc.subject.enThomas Nagel
dc.subject.plRządy prawa
dc.subject.plpraworządność
dc.subject.plMartin Krygier
dc.subject.plFriedrich Hayek
dc.titleRule of Law v. the Rule of Men and Women: What’s in the Distinction?
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication