Artykuł w czasopiśmie
Brak miniatury
Licencja
 

Scope ambiguities, monads and strengths

Uproszczony widok
dc.abstract.enIn this paper, we will discuss three semantically distinct scope assignment strategies: traditional movement strategy, polyadic approach, and continuation-based approach. As a generalized quantifier on a set X is an element of C(X), the value of continuation monad C on X, in all three approaches QPs are interpreted as C-computations. The main goal of this paper is to relate the three strategies to the computational machinery connected to the monad C (strength and derived operations). As will be shown, both the polyadic approach and the continuation-based approach make heavy use of monad constructs. In the traditional movement strategy, monad constructs are not used but we still need them to explain how the three strategies are related and what can be expected of them wrt handling scopal ambiguities in simple sentences.
dc.affiliationUniwersytet Warszawski
dc.contributor.authorGrudzińska-Zawadowska, Justyna
dc.contributor.authorZawadowski, Marek
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T19:46:48Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T19:46:48Z
dc.date.copyright2017-11-03
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.accesstimeAT_PUBLICATION
dc.description.financeNie dotyczy
dc.description.number2
dc.description.versionFINAL_PUBLISHED
dc.description.volume5
dc.identifier.doi10.15398/JLM.V5I2.163
dc.identifier.issn2299-8470
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/119083
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://jlm.ipipan.waw.pl/index.php/JLM/article/view/163
dc.languageeng
dc.pbn.affiliationphilosophy
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Language Modelling
dc.relation.pages179–227
dc.rightsOther
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.subject.enscope ambiguities
dc.subject.encontinuation monad
dc.subject.enstrength
dc.titleScope ambiguities, monads and strengths
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication