Artykuł w czasopiśmie
Brak miniatury
Licencja
CC-BY-NC-NDCC-BY-NC-ND - Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych
 

The Coercion–Extraction Cycle and the Paradox of Stability

Uproszczony widok
dc.abstract.enOur paper revisits the work of Samuel Finer and David Easton in order to establish a fi rmer grasp on the problem of political stability within a given state or regime. We suggest that Finer’s ap-proach to the problem of coercion–extraction is not wholly incompatible with Easton’s political system approach (as modifi ed by Gabriel Almond). By combining what Finer and Easton (as un-derstood through Almond) off er, we construct a framework that allows us to better understand political stability. Th e model we construct off ers current researchers exploring the workings of political stability a useful tool to study and focus on the various dynamics that drive the stability of any given political system.
dc.affiliationUniwersytet Warszawski
dc.contributor.authorJr, Clifford Bates
dc.contributor.authorPerlikowski, Lukasz
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T10:09:14Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T10:09:14Z
dc.date.copyright2022-06-09
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.accesstimeAT_PUBLICATION
dc.description.financePublikacja bezkosztowa
dc.description.number1
dc.description.versionFINAL_PUBLISHED
dc.description.volume10
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/PPSR-2022-0001
dc.identifier.issn2353-3773
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/122003
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2022-0001
dc.languageeng
dc.pbn.affiliationpolitical and administrative sciences
dc.relation.ispartofPolish Political Science Review. Polski Przegląd Politologiczny
dc.relation.pages1-20
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.titleThe Coercion–Extraction Cycle and the Paradox of Stability
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication