Artykuł w czasopiśmie
Brak miniatury
Licencja
ClosedAccessDostęp zamknięty
 

Legislative aims and the Kantian supranational court: A comment on Alec Stone Sweet and Clare Ryan, A Cosmopolitan Legal Order

Uproszczony widok
dc.abstract.enIn my short comment on the new book by Alec Stone Sweet and Clare Ryan, I claim that the European Court of Human Rights does not take the ‘legitimacy of state goals’ step in its proportionality analysis seriously enough, relegating all its hard intellectual work to the next step: necessity scrutiny. What is puzzling about Stone Sweet and Ryan’s book is that this observation about the ECtHR hardly registered in the book’s argument, even though a Kantian perspective seems to be quite hospitable to a consideration of the scarcity of goal scrutiny in ECtHR case law.
dc.affiliationUniwersytet Warszawski
dc.contributor.authorSadurski, Wojciech
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T05:08:24Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T05:08:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.financePublikacja bezkosztowa
dc.description.number3
dc.description.volume9
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S204538172000009X
dc.identifier.issn2045-3817
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/111059
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-constitutionalism/article/abs/legislative-aims-and-the-kantian-supranational-court-a-comment-on-alec-stone-sweet-and-clare-ryan-a-cosmopolitan-legal-order/E1335CEEA691B4103D64DB8573E8600D
dc.languageeng
dc.pbn.affiliationlaw
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Constitutionalism
dc.relation.pages515-522
dc.rightsClosedAccess
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.subject.enConvention jurisprudence
dc.subject.enEuropean Court of Human Rights
dc.subject.enKant
dc.subject.enproportionality analysis
dc.subject.ensupranational court
dc.titleLegislative aims and the Kantian supranational court: A comment on Alec Stone Sweet and Clare Ryan, A Cosmopolitan Legal Order
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication