Artykuł w czasopiśmie
Brak miniatury
Licencja
CC-BY - Uznanie autorstwaDisobedience of Judges as a Problem of Legal Philosophy and Comparative Constitutionalism: A Polish Case
| cris.lastimport.scopus | 2024-02-12T20:53:54Z |
| dc.abstract.en | The article takes up the difficult problem of the so-called disobedience of judges against the background of the experiences of the Polish departure from constitutional democracy in 2015-2020. The special role and responsibility of a judge in the state imposes restrictions on her freedom of opinion in the public sphere. Openly manifesting opposition to government policy, which in the case of an ordinary citizen is only the implementation of human rights and freedoms, may be described as controversial and contrary to applicable ethical regulations. The main thesis of this paper is the assertion that although judges who act as impartial arbitrators in disputes should generally refrain from ostentatiously opposing the actions of political authorities, they are not deprived of the possibility of protest. Also in the exercise of office, and not outside the sphere of their duties, judges should take into account overriding moral values that should be implemented by the legal order, and not the values or declarations guiding the government policies. The integrity of the judge, which prescribes restraint in statements and actions in the public sphere, as well as the care for the dignity of the office held, should not be confused with absolute subordination to the legislature or the executive, even if the judge is obliged to apply the law. The traditional attitude of the members of the judiciary, consisting in focusing only on the application of the law in individual cases and the lack of any political involvement, is being reviewed in the face of the spread of majoritarianism and the law abuse as normal techniques of exercising public authority. The disobedience of judges-although difficult to defend at first sight-may seem to be the only possible way to draw public attention to the corruption of the state system. The 'disobedient' judges can even be assigned the role of 'whistleblowers', which should help to ease their legal liability or their future rehabilitation. |
| dc.affiliation | Uniwersytet Warszawski |
| dc.contributor.author | Pilich, Mateusz |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-24T22:07:18Z |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-24T22:07:18Z |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 |
| dc.description.accesstime | BEFORE_PUBLICATION |
| dc.description.finance | Publikacja bezkosztowa |
| dc.description.version | FINAL_PUBLISHED |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/S11158-021-09501-8 |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1356-4765 |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl//handle/item/105007 |
| dc.identifier.weblink | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09501-8 |
| dc.language | eng |
| dc.pbn.affiliation | law |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Res Publica |
| dc.relation.pages | 1-25 |
| dc.rights | CC-BY |
| dc.sciencecloud | nosend |
| dc.subject.en | Judges |
| dc.subject.en | Professional Ethics |
| dc.subject.en | Disciplinary Liability |
| dc.subject.en | Non-Application of Law |
| dc.title | Disobedience of Judges as a Problem of Legal Philosophy and Comparative Constitutionalism: A Polish Case |
| dc.type | JournalArticle |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |